Legal practitioner Samson Lardy Anyenini has reacted to the brouhaha surrounding the suspension of four Members of Parliament (MPs) following the chaotic incident at the Appointments Committee sitting.
Lawyer Anyenini stated that the suspension of the MPs is in the right direction, in line with general standard practice.
However, in an interview on Adom FM’s Dwaso Nsem, he expressed concerns about the ad-hoc committee set up to probe the incident.
He acknowledged that, in a normal corporate structure, such an incident would have been referred to a disciplinary committee, which, in Speaker Bagbin’s view, is the same as the ad-hoc committee.
However, the host of JoyNews’ New File argued that the move by the Speaker contravenes the law, stating that the standing orders clearly stipulate that the Privileges Committee should handle matters of misconduct.
“The suspension of the MPs is in the right direction, but the probe by the bipartisan committee is problematic because the standing orders are clear that misconduct should be referred to the Privileges Committee,” he said.
He continued, “The argument that the committee doesn’t exist is invalid because the bipartisan committee was also just set up, and the same could have been done with the Privileges Committee.”
Despite this perspective, the legal practitioner emphasized that it is not for a party to fail to comply with a directive simply because the Speaker erred.
“I have read the law and the parliamentary act, but I didn’t see where the Speaker’s authority emanated from. But you can’t say his directive contravenes the law, so you won’t comply. If a judge makes a declaration and there is an error, you can’t say you won’t comply; instead, there are procedures you follow to seek redress,” he noted.
Lawyer Anyenini further asserted that the incident occurred at a committee meeting, not in Parliament. Therefore, the Appointments Committee Chairman, Bernard Ahiafor, should have taken charge.
Meanwhile, the Minority in Parliament has announced that they will not participate in the committee’s hearing, which is expected to start on Wednesday, February 5, 2025.
Suame MP, John Darko, explained that the standing orders only allow for a committee to be set up through a motion raised by the leaders of either side, which must then be seconded by the House. At that point, the Speaker would play a role in approving the establishment of the committee, but the procedures were not followed.
ALSO READ:
- Vetting chaos: We’re not here to witch-hunt our colleagues – Committee
Committee probing vetting chaos to begin public hearings on February 5